Tuesday, October 14, 2014

Sun, Moon, and Stars

Sun, Moon, and Stars:
by Samuel Bland
10/09/2014
Many times in Scriptures, idioms are used that we Westerners are not familiar with. If we do not understand that sometimes these figures of speech are indeed non-literal, we may interpret the Bible incorrectly. I hope to share what I have been shown, all for the search for truth and the advancement of God’s kingdom.
          

Babylon

If you recall from my previous post here, the Kingdom of Babylon was succeeded by the Medo-Persian Empire, as prophesied by Daniel. What is interesting is that Isaiah prophesied this as well. In Isaiah 13:1, we see him speaking of Babylon:

Isaiah 13:1  The burden of Babylon, which Isaiah the son of Amoz did see.

In the following verses, we read of great destruction and judgment upon Babylon, with descriptions such as “destroy the whole land” (vs. 5), “pain as a woman travaileth” (vs. 8), “the day of the LORD cometh” (vs. 9), etc. Then we get to this verse:

Isaiah 13:10  For the stars of heaven and the constellations thereof shall not give their light: the sun shall be darkened in his going forth, and the moon shall not cause her light to shine.

Amid all this language of God’s judgment and “destruction from the Almighty” (vs. 6), Isaiah prophesied that the celestial bodies such as the sun, moon, and stars will be darkened and not give forth their light!

We all believe the Bible, so we all undoubtedly would agree that this prophecy did indeed happen the way Isaiah said it would. External sources such as history confirms that Babylon was overthrown by the Medo-Persians in the 6th-century B.C.; however, there is no evidence that the actual sun and moon stopped shining. The question here is this: Was this talking about a literal darkening of the sun and moon and stars?

As one person I've talked to asked, “If the sun did go out literally, would it not be recorded in history? Why would it not if there is existing proof of historical events from that time?” Something to consider.

_____________________________________________________________


Egypt

Let’s rewind a bit. Before the Medes conquered Babylon, Babylon had conquered Egypt. This time, Ezekiel was given this prophecy. In Ezekiel 32:2, God is telling Ezekiel who He is addressing:

Ezekiel 32:2  Son of man, take up a lamentation for Pharaoh king of Egypt, and say unto him, Thou art like a young lion of the nations, and thou art as a whale in the seas: and thou camest forth with thy rivers, and troubledst the waters with thy feet, and fouledst their rivers.

All throughout Ezekiel 32, we read of great destruction such as “I shall make the land of Egypt desolate” (vs. 15) and “she is delivered to the sword” (vs. 20). We also read in vs. 11 that Babylon is the culprit of this overthrow. Things get interesting here:

Ezekiel 32:7-8  And when I shall put thee out, I will cover the heaven, and make the stars thereof dark; I will cover the sun with a cloud, and the moon shall not give her light. All the bright lights of heaven will I make dark over thee, and set darkness upon thy land, saith the Lord GOD.

Once again, amidst all this destructive language of God’s judgment, we read that the heavenly bodies will be darkened; the same exact language used to describe Babylon’s fall was describing Egypt’s fall. Did the moon stop shining? Were the stars darkened?

_____________________________________________________________


What does this mean?

Now that we have cited examples, I wish to reiterate: Throughout the Bible, there are phrases and idioms used that are no longer used today, and many times we misinterpret these and take them the wrong way.

For example, let’s say a book is printed today that uses the phrase “frog in his throat,” which obviously does not literally mean there is an amphibian in a person’s esophagus; this idiom actually means an itchy or scratchy feeling in the throat that needs to be cleared. But let’s say that this particular phrase stops being used over the next 1,000 years, people forget the meaning, and someone from this far distant future reads the book that has this phrase. Imagine their surprise and confusion at hearing of a frog in someone’s throat! Such as is the case with certain Biblical idioms.

According to thefreedictionary online, an idiom is as follows: “an expression of a given language that is peculiar to itself grammatically or cannot be understood from the individual meanings of its elements” (source). This basically means that an idiom cannot be understood by the phrase itself, such as “frog in his throat” does not have anything to do with frogs.

A prevailing method of interpretation in certain circles today purports that everything in the Bible should be taken literally and physically unless it does not make sense to the reader, in which case, we interpret it as figurative, such as in Revelation and the beast with 7 heads. A few issues with this view (aside from it being entirely subjective) is the fact that when we read the Bible, we are reading an English translation of a Hebrew/Greek manuscript, there is a Eastern-Western cultural barrier, and we are separated by 2,000+ years! Not everything in our English language can be directly translated over, and vice versa.

Interpreting the Bible correctly is paramount. In all areas of our study and research of the Word, we must take the right steps of interpretation, and the best way to interpret it is to let the Bible interpret itself―don't use the newspaper to interpret the Bible!

In the given two examples of Babylon and Egypt, I believe it is plainly obvious that the sun, moon, and stars were not literally darkened. This type of language was used in the Bible to describe destruction and a change in powers or authorities.

Genesis 1:16  And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.

From this verse, we see the sun and moon related to ruling. This gives us an indication of the role of the sun and moon when God speaks, such as in prophecy.

Remember Joseph’s dream (Genesis 37)? His father and brothers became angry with him because they knew that the sun and moon and stars represented them! Joseph’s dream came true: the sun, moon, and stars did indeed bow to him, but not literally.

To recap, Babylon was overthrown, and sun, moon, and stars were mentioned to change, get dark, be covered, etc. Similarly, Egypt was overthrown as well, and sun, moon, and stars were mentioned to change, get dark, be covered, etc. This merely represents a change in ruling or authority or government.

Having said all this, what would verses like these mean?:

Matthew 24:29  Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:

Acts 2:20  The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood, before that great and notable day of the Lord come:

           When interpreting Scripture, we have to be consistent. To say that these happenings were/will be literal is to say that the examples of Babylon and Egypt were also literal. I believe correct understanding of this particular concept is vital. This is especially true of endtime views, or else one might be expecting a beast with 7 heads or a lamb with 7 eyes.

The reason for this post is 1.) to share what I have been studying and have been shown, and 2.) to address the influx in other posts concerning lunar eclipses and such. We are studying the Bible, not astrology. I sincerely hope that this post and the organization of the above verses helps you better understand what the Bible says.

Monday, August 18, 2014

Quick Post Concerning the Trinity


Quick Post Concerning the Trinity
by Samuel Bland
08/18/2014


Who came in the flesh: Jesus or the Father?

This is a very short response to those who use verses such as John 3:16 to support the view of the Trinity. The verse in question is read as follows:

John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

The idea is that “God” here is God the Father and the “Son” is God the Son, and the supposed distinction between them supports the Trinitarian claim of three Persons in the Godhead. I do not believe this to be the case, and I will attempt to briefly show why.
According to Strong’s Concordance of Hebrew and Greek Lexicon, whenever “God” is used in the New Testament, the actual Greek word used is “Theos,” which is generally reserved for “the supreme Divinity” or simply God Himself.
In the case of John 3:16, “God” is translated from this Greek word “Theos”; Theos gave His Son. So to say that John 3:16 supports a distinction, such as saying that “God” here means God the Father, would be to say that Theos refers to God the Father. If the Father gave his Son, then Theos gave his Son; that is saying the same thing. Let’s see where else Theos is used:

1 Timothy 3:16 And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.

The word “God” used here is also translated from Theos. We can read this as “Theos was manifest in the flesh.” So if we assert that Theos refers to the Father, which Trinitarians do concerning John 3:16, we must come to the conclusion from 1 Timothy 3:16 that The Father was manifest in the flesh.
So who came in the flesh, Jesus or the Father? Interpreting this verse from a Trinitarian standpoint suddenly becomes tricky, while those who adhere to Oneness interpret it plainly: the Father and Jesus are one and the same! Jesus even says so:

John 10:30 I and my Father are one.
John 14:9 Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father?

Sunday, August 17, 2014

The Kingdom of God

The Kingdom of God
by Samuel Bland
08/16/2014
The purpose of this is to better understand what is meant when the Bible discusses the Kingdom of God. Please note that this is a concise overview of what I have been studying, and there are many others with a much deeper, greater understanding than I on this subject; if this interests you, I pray that you study deeper the things of God.


1.) The Old


To better grasp the New Testament mentionings of the Kingdom, I will briefly discuss what was mentioned in the Old Testament and how that leads into the New.
In Daniel chapter 2, we learn that there were to be four kingdoms, or world empires. The first one is revealed to be the Babylonian Empire, and subsequent chapters show the second is the Medo-Persian and the third is the Grecian. The fourth is generally understood to be the Roman Empire both by the description given and also by its timing. So we have this so far:
1.) Babylonian (Daniel 2:38)
2.) Medo-Persian (Daniel 2:39a, 5:28, 8:20)
3.) Grecian (Daniel 2:39b, 8:21)
4.) Roman (Daniel 2:40-43)
All of these empires have come and gone, just like Daniel prophesied. History confirms what was revealed to Daniel. Bible prophecy truly is amazing! I would like to point out that the kingdoms listed here in Daniel are all successive, meaning they all occurred one after the other without breaks or pauses. So, we continue reading descriptions of these kingdoms until we get to verse 44. Here is where it gets interesting:


Daniel 2:44  And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever.


Since we are talking about the Kingdom of God, I am sure you know what it means when it says that God shall set up a Kingdom (the Kingdom, to be exact!). What can be interesting is the timing of this Kingdom. We read that “in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom.” We have just established that these kings/kingdoms have all come and gone, so does that mean God has set up His Kingdom? To quote one of my favorite authors: More on this later!
I would like to point out that 4 times in the book of Daniel, it is said that “the most High ruleth in the kingdom of men.” Just something to consider as we move forward.
When we get to chapter 9, we read of the 70 Weeks of Daniel (please note: I won’t be getting too much into this part other than using it as a time frame). It is understood that 1 of these weeks mean 7 years, so 70 weeks actually means 70x7, or 490 years. This is not a random number! How many times did Jesus say we are to forgive our brethren?
So, Daniel received this prophecy of things to happen in the next 490 years, including the coming of Messiah. Lo and behold, at the latter end of these prophetic 490 years, Jesus came! Once again, we see history supporting the Bible. I would like to mention that when Jesus was born, He was born when the Roman Empire was in power; from this we know that the preceding three kingdoms have already gone away by this time. Also keep in mind that God said He would set up His Kingdom during these kingdoms.


2.) The New


For the next 400 years or so, God did not speak to man. Then, out of nowhere, a lone voice cried out in the wilderness. John the Baptist came and started preaching. What was his message?:


Matthew 3:2  And saying, Repent ye: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.


He came not only preaching about the Kingdom, but also that the Kingdom is at hand! Expressions like this shouldn’t be excused so easily. If we claim to interpret Bible the way it was written, how should we interpret this?
Some people think the Kingdom of God and the Kingdom of Heaven are two different things. Let’s see what the Bible says:


Matthew 11:11  Verily I say unto you, Among them that are born of women there hath not risen a greater than John the Baptist: notwithstanding he that is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.


Jesus mentions the Kingdom of Heaven in the book of Matthew concerning John the Baptist. What does Luke say?:


Luke 7:28  For I say unto you, Among those that are born of women there is not a greater prophet than John the Baptist: but he that is least in the kingdom of God is greater than he.


Both of these are the same stories and same circumstances, but Matthew and Luke recorded different words. Is this a contradiction? Absolutely not! The fact of the matter is that these two terms are used interchangeably. Here is another example:


Matthew 19:23  Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven.
Matthew 19:24  And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.


Once again, Kingdom of God is used interchangeably with Kingdom of Heaven. Now that we have established that, what exactly is the Kingdom of God? First let’s see what it isn’t:


Luke 17:20-21  And when he was demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come, he answered them and said, The kingdom of God cometh not with observation: Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.


In other words, the Kingdom cannot be seen. This gives us an understanding that the Kingdom is intangible or spiritual.


John 18:36  Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.


It is a heavenly Kingdom! The Kingdom of God is not like the four previous, earthly kingdoms.


Romans 14:17a  For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink;


Simply put, the Kingdom is once again not physical, like meat and drink of this world. It is not something you can touch or grasp. So what is the Kingdom?


Romans 14:17  For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink; but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost.


This further drives home the point that the Kingdom is a spiritual one!


3.) The When


To reiterate on what has been discussed thus far:
  • We know that God would set up His Kingdom during the four kingdoms prophesied by Daniel.
  • We know that Jesus came during the final, fourth kingdom of the Roman Empire.
  • We know that the Kingdom of God is the same as Kingdom of Heaven.
  • We know that the Kingdom of God is spiritual and not physical.


So, what does the Bible say about the timing of the Kingdom?:


Matthew 4:17  From that time Jesus began to preach, and to say, Repent: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.
Matthew 10:7  And as ye go, preach, saying, The kingdom of heaven is at hand.
Mark 1:15  And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.


We see that Jesus emphasized the imminency of the Kingdom. Mark even records that the time was fulfilled! I want to teach what the Bible teaches.


Luke 9:27  But I tell you of a truth, there be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the kingdom of God.


Jesus spoke these words. He stated that there were some that were standing right there next to Him 2,000 years ago who would not die until they actually saw the Kingdom! How else should we interpret this? There are many, many more verses just like these in the Gospels, please feel free to check them out on your own. For the sake of brevity, I kept the list short.
How does one enter the Kingdom?:


John 3:5  Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.


We know that this relates directly to Acts 2:38, but when does this “entering” occur?:


Colossians 1:12-13  Giving thanks unto the Father, which hath made us meet to be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in light: Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son:


Paul wrote this. The “hath translated us" part is indisputably present tense.


Luke 11:20    But if I with the finger of God cast out devils, no doubt the kingdom of God is come upon you.


In closing, I would like to make a note: I have kept my commentary on these verses limited, as I believe that Scriptures interpret themselves.


Having said all of this, I would like to end with this statement:
Welcome to the Kingdom!